Who's Really Running the Show?

[ruckstar]

I received this in an e-mail and thought some of you would like to read it as well.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The No Bull Newsletter

Who's Really Running the Show?


I have been having a nagging intuition lately that something is not quite right about Barack Obama. I am not suggesting there is something wrong with the man, per se. Nor am I talking about the crazy, even dangerous, policies coming out of the White House.

No, lately, I have been wondering if Barack Obama is, in fact, the person who is actually functioning as President of the United States [POTUS] .

I mean, there's no doubt that he fills the position of POTUS but is he really the one in command? The man actually seems lost at times. He seems to be reacting to ideas about which he does not really have a clue. He has left the writing of this health care bill to Nancy Pelosi's House of Representatives and she, in turn, has farmed the writing out to several fairly radical community action groups.

When questioned about health care, he seems not to know or understand the details and even with his silver-tongue seems unable to demonstrate any leadership on the issue.

With respect to Afghanistan and the rest of our foreign policy, he seems equally lost. Especially when it comes to dealing with other world leaders. He makes beautiful speeches but seems to be unable to cut deals which benefit our nation. He seems to be acting as a pawn of much more clever world leaders.

The more I watch the man, the more I see a person who appears to be the "face" of some other entity or group. He seems like a "front man". And it is becoming clear that his strings are being pulled by someone else. He does not appear to be the man in command of the ship of state. At least, he is not in the driver's seat.

You might recall that people said about Bush that he was a front man for the neo-cons and that it was really Dick Cheney that was running the show. It turns out that Dick Cheney was not as influential in Bush's second term as many thought but, perhaps it is true that the neo-cons, whoever they may be, were pulling some of Bush's strings.

On the other hand, with Obama, it does not appear that there is anyone who is visible to we the people, or the media, who is pulling the strings. If they are there, they are not in elected positions as Cheney was. They are better hidden than that.

We know that Obama has been, and remains, surrounded by life-long radicals, professed communists and anti-capitalists, some of whom he has even appointed as czars in his administration. Thirty six czars, to date.

But is it Obama who is picking the czars, or is it the czars who are running the show and propping up Obama as their front man?

I know all this may sound crazy but, really, when you look at the man without the idolatry and media worship, does he really look like he knows what he is doing? Does he seem to have a direction? Firm convictions? Something he deeply believes in? The more he talks now, the more his words seem empty of content. Platitudes about America and the American people which, when he says them, simply do not ring true. They are words being mouthed but not believed by him.

Okay, so maybe he is really clever, is firmly moving the ship to the left while mouthing the words of a centrist. But I don't think so.

What I used to think was that he was a really slick conman who was making us watch his left hand while he was manipulating us with his right. But, now I don't think that so much. I think the man is more plastic than real. Now I begin to see him as the "Great and Powerful Oz": a fearsome presence who is being manipulated by men behind the curtain. And while Obama does not have strong convictions, the men behind the curtain do. And they are moving this country down a dangerous path. All the while, we are being distracted by Obama and what he says and does.

Okay, maybe I am simply a mildly paranoid conspiracy theorist.. Why, you might ask, have Obama up there? Why not have one of the actual people behind the curtain run for President. Well, being a paranoid conspiracy theorist, I can come up with an answer to that question.

Those other people behind the curtain have backgrounds that are so radical that they would never have made it past the first few days of a campaign. Additionally, they are life-long community organizers and they know what kind of face can be effective if you wish to radically change the nation.

First, you need a black man to gain the support of the vast black minority.

Second, you need a pale skinned black man so as not to be too much of a threat to white Americans. For the same reasons, you need a mixed race man who allies himself with the poor and down-trodden.

And you need someone who speaks well enough to co-opt the language of the right and appear to be a uniter, not a divider. Someone who sees, or at least can articulate, both sides of an issue.. This is the kind of man you would pick to be your front man so that while you move things drastically and dramatically left, the vast majority of Americans will not believe that was the intention of the moderate appearing front man.

Yes, Obama was a community organizer. Yes, he could be clever enough to have all this be his idea. But he really wasn't a community organizer for that long. And when he was, he didn't do anything truly radical.

It was more a time during which he was being trained than a time when he was driven by a personal sense of commitment to anything in particular.

There are people who are now in his government who have been community organizers and radical left wing activists for 20-30 years. These people have deeply ingrained commitments to changing the system and have been actively trying to do so for all that time. Obama is not one of them.

In my view, Obama has been trained and used as a puppet by others for a long time. His successes seem to have come too easily, as if they have been orchestrated. His life appears to have been pre-planned.

I mean, Harvard Law Review without publishing a single paper of note.

That is unusual..

A community organizer for a short time.

A State legislator for a short time.

A freshman US Senator. (143 days)

A convention key-note speaker.

And then POTUS. How does that happen? A person with zero governmental administrative experience is running the entire government of the United States ...

How do 1100 page documents get developed and put out in such short order?

Who is writing all these proposals?

Does it not seem that something is just not quite right here?

Forget about the specifics of the policies for the moment. Have you ever seen this level of activity in the first few months of any other administration in your lifetime?

Does Obama seem like the kind of person that could manage this level of activity in so short a time?

Too much does not make sense here.

So, slowly but surely, I am becoming convinced that it is not Barack Obama who is running the show. The White House has been captured by a group of people who are using Barack Obama as their front man. He is nothing but an articulate but empty suit.. We have to start looking behind the curtains to find out who is really controlling the "great and powerful Obama".

Something to think about..............

[L Haney]

Welcome to the institution of the Office of the President of the United States. You've just described how it's worked since it was invented. Congratulations. This message brought to you by the night clerk at the office of the blisteringly obvious.

[drjarhead]

Yeah, he is so far over his head I don't see it as possible he has a clue or is capable of leadership.

It really wouldn't surprise me if Soros and a few others were really running our govt right now.
That said, this could not happen in a vacuum. Others in leadership positions within Congress and the Pentagon would know. So why the silence? What do, or would, our generals think?

The only thing I'm sure about is 'bongo is incompetent and arrogant. Both are competing for first place it seems.

[lsmurphy]

It's about an entire group of commies, O has surrounded himself with our enemies.

Scott

[L Haney]

It's always been a group. It's noticeable so badly this time because ALL of these jokers are inept.

[CPO TED]

Originally Posted by L Haney

It's always been a group. It's noticeable so badly this time because ALL of these jokers are inept.

I don't buy into grand conspiracies much.

I fear its MUCH bigger than simple conspiracies.


Its ASSHOLES!!!

The freakin' government is FILLED with them!!!!

BIG ONES!!!


But your right, Lowell. Normally, its Presidency by Committee.

What's worse, the first bunch of years its the "Committee to Reelect the President."

The last bunch of years it's the "Committee to to Establish and Protect the Legacy."



I worry about this bunch though. I think the O'bama is surrounded with "True Believers". I don't think this crew believes in HIM as much as they believe in THEIR agenda.

These guys give me the heebeegeebees.

Very similar to the ones I got from the Nixon administration.


And Haldeman, Erichman, Mitchell & Dean were as slimy a crew of cutthroats and pirates as ever was assembled.

T

[Aug's Dad]

Anyone here visit WarRifles forum? There's a few fellows over there that say it's a NWO/Bilderberg/Trilateral/World Bank conspiracy. Ain't sayin' they're right or wrong, just sayin'.

[lsmurphy]

Originally Posted by Aug's Dad

Anyone here visit WarRifles forum? There's a few fellows over there that say it's a NWO/Bilderberg/Trilateral/World Bank conspiracy. Ain't sayin' they're right or wrong, just sayin'.

No. It's simple. The folks elected a commy and the commy appointed 3300 other little commies and the media is along for the ride to the ovens.

Really that simple.

Scott

[lsmurphy]

And were the Soros' waiting in the wings???? Exactly.

Every commy with all their commy agendas are at the circus, good show huh?

Scott

[TwoBit]

Post # 2 and # 5 nailed it.
Not because that is a fellow Mod, it is just true (IMO).

[Coach]

"Barack Hussein Obama is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life."

[lsmurphy]

Originally Posted by Coach

"Barack Hussein Obama is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life."

You sound like a man in love. kisses

Scott

[Coach]

Paraphrasing "The Manchurian Candidate".
The 1962 one with Sinatra, not the Denzel one.

[kanscheapskate]

Originally Posted by lsmurphy

No. It's simple. The folks elected a commy and the commy appointed 3300 other little commies and the media is along for the ride to the ovens.

Really that simple.

Scott

One thing I envy about you Scott is you keep your feelings so bottled up, just imagine if you really told the world how you felt!

[bluak47]

might just be commie generals, eh?

Is The Military Threatening To Kill Obama?
Barack in the Crosshairs
By John Hankey
2-21-10

There is a financial oligarchy in this country, that tries, by every means available to it, to control all essential political activity, including the education of the citizens, their thinking, the information available to them, etc. Some politicians genuinely see themselves as public servants, and wish to serve the public good. They can give passionate and inspiring speeches, spoken truly from the heart * but they know good and well that if they want to get elected they must carry out the agenda of the elite.

All politicians, even those trying to make society more fair, must be brought to heel, one way or another. It is not a simple game. And the tools used to control politicians are varied: controlling the information they receive is often effective; some times bribery or a scandal is necessary. It was necessary to shoot John and Robert Kennedy in the head. The bloody deaths of the Kennedy brothers sent a message to every politician, that still echoes today. And I think the evidence shows that Obama received a reminder of this message recently.

The parallels between the administrations of Barack Obama and John Kennedy are stunning:

1. Both engaged in what might be called "Election Deception" During the 1960 election, Kennedy attacked Nixon for being soft on communism, particularly Cuba. In his book, 6 Crises, Nixon complained, bitterly and accurately, that this was an unscrupulous deception on Kennedy's part. Kennedy had been briefed that Nixon and the CIA were planning a full scale invasion of Cuba. So, even though he knew it wasn't true, Kennedy attacked Nixon from the right, claiming that he, Kennedy, was more of a hawk on Cuba than Nixon. As soon as he got in, Kennedy told the CIA to forget their invasion plans; the CIA went ahead anyway at the Bay of Pigs; and Kennedy fired the top three men at CIA for disobeying his orders.*1 The military shared Nixon's perception that Kennedy was a liar and a traitor.

During the 2004 election, Obama surrounded himself with hawks like Zbigniew Brzezinski, and attacked Bush from the right, saying that he had neglected "the right war," the war in Afghanistan, and that he, Obama, would transfer troops and treasure to the effort in Afghanistan. However, once he got in, Obama brought none of the Brzezinski people with him. None of them. Not Richard Clark. Not Anthony Lake (both of whom were very active in Obama's campaign, and are very deep-cover operatives for the darkest side of the Pentagon). And, as you will see, Obama fought bitterly with the military over their desire for more troops.
2. Both Kennedy and Obama experienced a dramatic change of attitude toward the military early in their presidencies. Even if Obama did not perpetrate a deception to win the election, after he was sworn in got in, his thinking and attitude toward the military began to change dramatically, sharpen and harden against them. This directly parallels what happened to Kennedy.

...

continued: http://www.rense.com/general89/mil.htm

[lsmurphy]

His days are numbered and Hell awaits.

Scott

[GMBshootingclubM60]

bluak47 beat me to it. Rense.com is a good info source.

1944, Bretton Woods defines post war world.

1952, Mac Arthur ran. Eisenhower, who had a lot of 'baggage' from his overseas duty during WW2 (see Patton), was pushed into the race... by who?

1960, Kennedy. Put the brakes on the federal reserve and the CIA. I was coming out of college freshman German class at 11:00 and heard the news about how well he was dealing with 'them'.

1964, Gulf of Tonkin. Johnson cowered, didn't run for reelection.

1968. George Wallace shot. Kissinger and Nixon win. I voted absentee, since I was away for a little party overseas that year (TET).

1971, Nixon axes Bretton Woods and floats the dollar. No longer useful, Nixon resigns.

1976 Carter.. does anyone think he was in control of anything? The strange thing was that Carter was in the nuclear Navy, served above and beyond the call and was starting graduate work in physics at Union College in Schenectady, NY. Union at that time was the top school in physics, due to the $$$ from the General Electric nuclear research program at Knolls labs up the road from Union. I was an undergraduate there at the time. When I saw a proven, intelligent person start acting like a fool, my eyes were starting to open.

1980 Reagan runs against bush sr (voodoo economics). After Ron wins, they take him in a side room. He comes out and says his running mate would be bush sr., globalist. Reagan does lots of 'non Reagan' stuff. He's shot (tap on the shoulder?). Airline controllers. Amnesty for illegal aliens. TEFRA. Stock market crash and bank bailout.

1988 bush sr., globalist.

1992, clinton. NAFTA (bill, are you crazy?! you would never agree to this unless somebody held a gun to your... Oh, nevermind. Waco, brady, GATT, WTO, wait! what's that....! a 747 going down in LI sound while you're running in '96 for reelection? Monica who?

2000 bush jr, globalist. 911 patriot act, tsa, etc.

OK, now I'm caught up....

[bluak47]

Originally Posted by GMBshootingclubM60

1976 Carter.. does anyone think he was in control of anything? The strange thing was that Carter was in the nuclear Navy, served above and beyond the call and was starting graduate work in physics at Union College in Schenectady, NY. Union at that time was the top school in physics, due to the $$$ from the General Electric nuclear research program at Knolls labs up the road from Union. I was an undergraduate there at the time. When I saw a proven, intelligent person start acting like a fool, my eyes were starting to open.

1980 Reagan runs against bush sr (voodoo economics). After Ron wins, they take him in a side room. He comes out and says his running mate would be bush sr., globalist. Reagan does lots of 'non Reagan' stuff. He's shot (tap on the shoulder?). Airline controllers. Amnesty for illegal aliens. TEFRA. Stock market crash and bank bailout.

1988 bush sr., globalist.

1992, clinton. NAFTA (bill, are you crazy?! you would never agree to this unless somebody held a gun to your... Oh, nevermind. Waco, brady, GATT, WTO, wait! what's that....! a 747 going down in LI sound while you're running in '96 for reelection? Monica who?

2000 bush jr, globalist. 911 patriot act, tsa, etc.

OK, now I'm caught up....

... all either Rhodes Scholars, or members of Tri-Lateral Commission.

Bushes, and Kennedy's instrumental in funding Hilter's rise to power, and the Nazi Third Reich. The CIA developed from bringing the former SS into this Nation post WW2. The banking elite all the way through this, through carefully created careers, government creation, economic creation. Follow the money, not the drama they pitch fork out to us domestic swine.

[GMBshootingclubM60]

1983. I forgot KAL 007. Larry MacDonald goes missing with 007, Jesse Helms is OK on the second section 747, 15 minutes behind.

Larry was a strong anti-communist.....

[GMBshootingclubM60]

1993. Clinton. I forgot wtc bombing number one. Govt allowed bombers to use real explosives instead of powdered milk....

[armchair_warrior]

same people in charge before are still in charge now, nothing has change. the two parties are really one party.

they fool you to think there are differences in the two parties.

[lsmurphy]

Originally Posted by armchair_warrior

same people in charge before are still in charge now, nothing has change. the two parties are really one party.

they fool you to think there are differences in the two parties.

Freaky.

Scott

[bluak47]

GMB:

BSchlossberg From Israel, joined Mar 2005, 78 posts, RR: 0
Reply 45, posted Wed Apr 20 2005 08:40:54 your local time (4 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2000 times:

Not so deserted!
"August 31/September 1, 1983 was the worst possible night for KAL 007 to
'bump the buffer' for a complexity of reasons—all of them ominous. It was but a few
short hours before the time that Marshal Ogarkov, Soviet Chief of General Staff, had set
for the test firing of the SS-25, an illegal mobile Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
(ICBM).15 The SS-25 was to be launched from Plesetsk, the launch site in northwest
Russia which was used for test firing of solid fuel propellant ICBMs—24 minutes later to
land in the Klyuchi target area on the Kamchatka Peninsula. (see - http://www.rescue007.org/docs/HowKAL007WasLost.pdf )

In addition, Kamchatka was home to the Far East Fleet Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Nuclear Submarine Base (30 Ballistic missiles and 90 attack submarines) as well as a number of military airfields. Petropavlovsk and Kamchatka were bristling with weaponry!


Bert Schlossberg, International Director, International Committee for the Rescue of KAL 007 Survivors

[armchair_warrior]

Originally Posted by lsmurphy

Freaky.

Scott

same war but expanded, same folks from wall st running the fed and treasury, same big government. only the rhetoric is different. but actions remain the same.

Obama is basically serving Bush's 3rd term but expanded.

if you really pay attentions to the actions of the white house nothing has changed. only the rhetoric. call him a commie and bush a neon con. but they are the same in action.