The AK Files Forums
FN/FAL  •  H&K


top_register.gif top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    
 Welcome
Welcome to the The AK Files Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.


The AK Files Forums > Rifle Forums > AK-47s > I.O. INC AK47-C

Search this Thread:

newthread reply AK-47s
prev.gif Previous Thread | Next Thread next.gif
 

Author
Topic: I.O. INC AK47-C  
folder icon   01-16-2009, 04:15 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #1
PLAGUE
New Member


I.O. INC AK47-C

Hello all. Still waiting to get my hands on my first AK. I am on a waiting list at a local shop. The shop is getting AK47-C from I.O INC. I did a search and only got one hit. Just wondering if it is worth the $700? Is it this rilfle in the same level as a wasr 10? Another option would be is to spend more money and get a converted saiga ak-103 or get an ak from Lancaster Arms. Any input would would be greatly appreciated.Thanks

Here is the AK47-C
http://www.ioinc.us/graphics2/akpolymertxt.jpg

AKaholic # 23039
Status: Offline | Posts: 19 | Registered: Dec 2008
folder icon   01-17-2009, 09:32 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif home.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #2
JSPAG138
Banned


Avatar

Avoid the AK47-C like the plague, all puns intended. You can't go wrong with a Lancaster Arms build......

AKaholic # 27267
Status: Offline | Posts: 280 | Registered: Jan 2009
folder icon   01-17-2009, 10:17 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #3
Fortis
Veteran Member


Avatar

I`d agree on the Lancaster. I`ve got one & am happy w/ it. Just make sure you buy from a reputable source as I was told by them that there is a few fakes floating around. I think Atlantic may still have some, or you could buy direct for probably a little more.

__________________
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests” - Patrick Henry
“The result of an irresistible freedom force meeting an immovable tyrannical object is, well, revolution." Beagle's Third Law of Governance -
WTB-`82 Delorean & Flux Capacitor.
AKaholic # 16269
Status: Online | Posts: 1,911 | Registered: Oct 2008
folder icon   01-18-2009, 01:29 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #4
PLAGUE
New Member


Thanks guys. I talked to Lancaster and they said that it would take 30 to build and ship. Atlantic is out of the question because they will not ship to CA. That is funny because Lancaster Arms will. The only thing that they have to do is remove the pistol grip to make it CA legal. But I am on the fence about the Lancaster arms ak or a converted saiga AK-103. Maybe i will pm Atlantic on this site to get some clarification. Just hard to wait 30 days + 10 day dros. thanks again guys.

AKaholic # 23039
Status: Offline | Posts: 19 | Registered: Dec 2008
folder icon   01-18-2009, 01:43 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #5
Fortis
Veteran Member


Avatar

Quote:
Originally Posted by PLAGUE
Thanks guys. I talked to Lancaster and they said that it would take 30 to build and ship. Atlantic is out of the question because they will not ship to CA. That is funny because Lancaster Arms will. The only thing that they have to do is remove the pistol grip to make it CA legal. But I am on the fence about the Lancaster arms ak or a converted saiga AK-103. Maybe i will pm Atlantic on this site to get some clarification. Just hard to wait 30 days + 10 day dros. thanks again guys.
The only thing w/ the Saiga is that I don`t think they take standard AK mags, which the Lancaster does. The Saigas do seem to be a little beefier than some, though I`m not sure if there`s an actual difference in receiver thickness. Then again I`m basing that comparison on a saiga 12.

__________________
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests” - Patrick Henry
“The result of an irresistible freedom force meeting an immovable tyrannical object is, well, revolution." Beagle's Third Law of Governance -
WTB-`82 Delorean & Flux Capacitor.
AKaholic # 16269
Status: Online | Posts: 1,911 | Registered: Oct 2008
folder icon   01-19-2009, 03:36 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #6
DizzyV6P
Member


I have the IO AK and have had no problems with it.

http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showt...3&highlight=ioi

http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44507

Another Links:

http://www.xdtalk.com/forums/ak-47-...ce-ak-47-a.html

http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=11208

For those bashing the IO Ak's, please give some examples on why they are bad. A couple of members on this forum as well as many other forums are pretty satisfied with the build and quality.

For $550-$600 OTD, its a pretty good value and requires NO modifications at all. Unlike a WASR with its various canted sights, need to refinish the furniture, etc... the IO Ak-47's are ready to go right out of the box. I've been able to fit all sorts of mags w/o any wobble issues. It shoots straight and goes bang every time. I can throw any sort of option on it w/o any worries about Section 922.

That being all said, there's also nothing wrong w/ Lancaster AK-47's. Many folks that own it rave about the quality. They do a great job with their AK-47. You can see it in the price as well

Good luck with whatever you choose.

AKaholic # 17796
Status: Offline | Posts: 37 | Registered: Oct 2008
folder icon   01-19-2009, 05:36 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif home.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #7
JSPAG138
Banned


Avatar

Im not judging the build at all. I'm pretty sure it's a straight shooter. What I dont like is that they pretty much advertise that it's an ALL AMERICAN AK47. Not exactly something I look for when buying an AK. I have friends that put on all the new rail systems and collapsible AR buttstocks and things of that sort. To me, I want my AK to look as "insurgent" as possible. Like it just got dug up out of cache of weapons and was buried next to an RPG and a few hand grenades.....

AKaholic # 27267
Status: Offline | Posts: 280 | Registered: Jan 2009
folder icon   01-20-2009, 01:53 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #8
PLAGUE
New Member


Thanks Dizzy for the info. Do you know if they are legal in CA. I had asked about ak47-C on the calguns.net site and a member had said that they were not legal in CA.

Last edited by PLAGUE on 01-20-2009 at 02:10 AM.
AKaholic # 23039
Status: Offline | Posts: 19 | Registered: Dec 2008
folder icon   01-22-2009, 10:04 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #9
nsjames
Member


Quote:
Originally Posted by PLAGUE
Thanks Dizzy for the info. Do you know if they are legal in CA. I had asked about ak47-C on the calguns.net site and a member had said that they were not legal in CA.
It's my understanding that you can't have anything with a high cap removable magazine in CA.

AKaholic # 22312
Status: Offline | Posts: 33 | Registered: Dec 2008
folder icon   01-25-2009, 04:31 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #10
neotracer075
New Member


I just picked one up this past Friday... The one I got seems solid so far still waiting for the weather to break to get out and see though. I also picked up a WASR-10 on Tuesday lacking the usual WASR like problems...

I have pics in my link...

http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47893

Thanks,
neotracer

AKaholic # 28899
Status: Offline | Posts: 6 | Registered: Jan 2009
folder icon   01-30-2009, 09:18 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif email.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #11
jennymikeb
Member


I have one, it is a really nice AKM, better than my wasr. IO is a good company, it is just a small company and they get behind. See my post from November when I picked it up at their facility. $700 is a little rich for my blood, but prices are high at the moment on everything.

http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44507

AKaholic # 13564
Status: Offline | Posts: 128 | Registered: Jul 2008
folder icon   01-31-2009, 12:15 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #12
PLAGUE
New Member


Thanks guys your all your input. I went with a AKM from Lancaster Arms. The Local shop here ended up not getting the I.O. rifles. Now I just have to wait 30 days for them to build and ship . Just really hard right now to get any thing in CA.

AKaholic # 23039
Status: Offline | Posts: 19 | Registered: Dec 2008
folder icon   02-02-2009, 08:01 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #13
ak sam
Banned


I have the Interordnance STG-2000c

To the best of my knowledge, and the internet, the Ak-47c is a Romanian receiver with the rest of the gun being U.S. made. I have the stg-2000c, since March 2008, and it is a nice shooter. It is the same as the ak-47c except the forearm grip is different. The Stg-2000c is copied after an East German Design, only the aesetics not the functionality. The Stg-2000c was given bad press, and I was told not to buy it, but no one had an argument as to why. I have cycled over a thousand rounds in the last 10 months, and it performs flawlessly. I put on a Bushnell Trophy 1x28mm red-dot scope which gives me the capabilities to shoot 3 1/2" to 5" groups at 100 yards with Wolf MIL-Spec ammo. Do not let the die hard ak-traditionalist persuade you to think that your getting, for lack of a better word, a shitty weapon. If you are wondering Interordnance tells all their consumers that only thermold mags are guaranteed to work in their STG-2000c and ak-47c models. That is a lie. I have tried almost all of the european countrie's steel mags and they work well. The thermold mags jiggle when shooting, and the steel mags are not jiggly. They are firm. I have never heard an actual problem, but have heard to avoid them like the plague. Just jacking with you (PLAGUE).

AKaholic # 29949
Status: Offline | Posts: 5 | Registered: Jan 2009
folder icon   02-02-2009, 08:05 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #14
ak sam
Banned


Quote:
Originally Posted by JSPAG138
Avoid the AK47-C like the plague, all puns intended. You can't go wrong with a Lancaster Arms build......

I was wondering if there were any specific problems with the ak-47c, since you advise to avoid them like the plague. Just wondering.

AKaholic # 29949
Status: Offline | Posts: 5 | Registered: Jan 2009
folder icon   02-05-2009, 02:29 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #15
DizzyV6P
Member


The receivers are supposed to be U.S. made. Many of the ones shipped to MD have RPG Arms (ERTD) receivers built in Houston, TX. As far as the rest of the gun being U.S. made, there are some that say the innards are really Romanian. The trunnions have no markings so there's no way to tell. I was told by IOI that the barrel is made by Mossberg. I was advised by IOI to use Thermold and Tapco mags. However, my steel Bulgarians (20rd and 30 rd) and polymer 40 rd Hungarian fit w/o any problems.

AKaholic # 17796
Status: Offline | Posts: 37 | Registered: Oct 2008
folder icon   03-15-2010, 12:36 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #16
lvdesert
New Member


Quote:
Originally Posted by JSPAG138
Im not judging the build at all. I'm pretty sure it's a straight shooter. What I dont like is that they pretty much advertise that it's an ALL AMERICAN AK47. Not exactly something I look for when buying an AK. I have friends that put on all the new rail systems and collapsible AR buttstocks and things of that sort. To me, I want my AK to look as "insurgent" as possible. Like it just got dug up out of cache of weapons and was buried next to an RPG and a few hand grenades.....

so you suggested anyone should avoid IO Inc's AK like the plague because its not made foreign huh... OK? no wonder your banned. i had their STG2000-C in 7.62 and it was a great rifle. been thinking about getting me the standard wood model cause i miss the STG.

Last edited by lvdesert on 03-15-2010 at 12:45 AM.
AKaholic # 74140
Status: Online | Posts: 8 | Registered: Feb 2010
folder icon   03-15-2010, 03:12 AM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #17
Blazed30
Member


Lancaster was a good choice I was going to put a vote in for a Saiga but Lancasters make some great AK's. Their factory is not far from my house either but I have never gotten anything from them just shot a couple and handled them anyway I am sure you will be pleased with it once it arrives.

AKaholic # 69260
Status: Offline | Posts: 122 | Registered: Jan 2010
folder icon   03-15-2010, 05:20 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #18
warhound
Member


Avatar

Quote:
I have friends that put on all the new rail systems and collapsible AR buttstocks and things of that sort. To me, I want my AK to look as "insurgent" as possible. Like it just got dug up out of cache of weapons and was buried next to an RPG and a few hand grenades.....

Different people like different things, I myself think collapsing stocks are ridiculous on ANY gun, but that's because I have no use for them.


According to an article in the new Guns & Ammo AK magazine, IO is getting their trunnions made by US companies. I can't speak for gas blocks, carriers, bolts, et cetera. But they claim it's all US. I would expect a higher price tag if that was the case.

AKaholic # 52523
Status: Online | Posts: 185 | Registered: Aug 2009
folder icon   03-17-2010, 12:40 PM
profile.gif sendpm.gif email.gif find.gif buddy.gif edit.gif reply with quote    Post #19
walldj45
New Member


Speaking of Lancaster Quality control, this is from this forum over in the ak 74 section.


http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64048

AKaholic # 78087
Status: Offline | Posts: 20 | Registered: Mar 2010
Return to Top  

newthread reply AK-47s
prev.gif Previous Thread | Next Thread next.gif
 

printer.gif Show Printable Version
sendtofriend.gif Email this Page
Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On

All times are GMT -5 hours. The time now is 10:13 PM.

The AK Files Forums > Rifle Forums > AK-47s > I.O. INC AK47-C
< Contact Us - The AK Files - Archive >
Return to Top

The Opinions, Views and Comments expressed by the members of this forum are their own and do not necessarily state or reflect those of The AK Files or any of it's agents. the AK Files does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of these messages and opinions, and does not perform an independent investigation to verify their truth or accuracy. All posted messages are the sole responsibility of the person from which such post originated. The AK Files assumes no liability in any way for the content of any posted message or opinion, including, but not limited to, any errors or ommissions in any posted message.

©2003-2004 The FAL Files, Inc. All rights Reserved. No part of this website or it's content may be reproduced without express written permission. The aK logo is used with permission from Targetweb.net. All rights to this logo are reserved by TargetWeb.net

image linking to 100 Top Guns and Gear Sites
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.0 Beta 7
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.