SoundFx
Hello Folks,
Just saw these rifles on their website. I'm by no means an AK traditionalist, so the fact that there are a lot of historically incorrect aspects really doesn't bother me. My question is this - Can anyone see a reason why these guns would not be good functionally? To me, they look really great.
Lastly, I have several AK-74 kits with the original Bulgarian barrels. I know that the new Lancasters have US-made chrome lined barrels. If I (and this is doubtful) ever wore out the Lancaster barrel, do you think these milled 74's would take stamped receiver parts? In other words, did Lancaster make these receivers to accept stamped 74 kits? I'm guessing so, but I'm a noob and I didn't want to automatically assume.
Thanks in advance for any responses,
Sfx
Just saw these rifles on their website. I'm by no means an AK traditionalist, so the fact that there are a lot of historically incorrect aspects really doesn't bother me. My question is this - Can anyone see a reason why these guns would not be good functionally? To me, they look really great.
Lastly, I have several AK-74 kits with the original Bulgarian barrels. I know that the new Lancasters have US-made chrome lined barrels. If I (and this is doubtful) ever wore out the Lancaster barrel, do you think these milled 74's would take stamped receiver parts? In other words, did Lancaster make these receivers to accept stamped 74 kits? I'm guessing so, but I'm a noob and I didn't want to automatically assume.
Thanks in advance for any responses,
Sfx